Mobile Events

The startup quandary: do we want followers or do we want fans?

There is a simple answer to the question above: we want both. What is not so simple of course is exactly what that really means.

With the bevy of tech conferences that have and will be continue to be going on throughout the past and coming weeks (SXSW, MWC, LWS, etc.), we’ve all been introduced to a host of startup companies all vying for their little slice of the public’s affection, and the truth of the matter is that many, if not most of them, will eventually fail.

While a sexy startup can attract plenty of attention from the public in a very short amount of time thanks to social media sharing, we’ve noticed that a surplus of followers doesn’t always equate to a long life in the tech industry.

Now, we certainly recognize the value of spreading the word about your company, and we’re not here to argue that getting hundreds of thousands of “likes” is a bad thing, but we do want to take a minute to think about what those “likes” actually mean. For an established company, say Coca Cola or Pepsi, Facebook likes are nice, but don’t really serve a purpose beyond providing the brand with one more stat to toss around. For startup companies, likes can help build a brand while providing marketing without having to spend money, however they also tend to be a bit over-valued. The main reason for this is that likes can get buried in a newsfeed (even with the new timeline format) and while they suggest that someone found something useful or interesting, these likes don’t actually represent any real connection they may have with the product or business.

In terms of Facebook a much more valuable strategy is striving to get people to share your content. Sharing is a much more personal means of spreading the word about something a person actually cares about, and immediately sparks conversation between not only current users and potential users, but users and the company itself.

The same philosophy applies to other social networking channels. Twitter is the obvious choice here as a bloated number of followers is often tossed around as an influential stat. What companies tend not to focus on however is who these followers are. If you run a startup company and you have 100,000 followers, you’re probably pretty excited. However if only 300 of those followers are actually interested in your product and the rest are just following because their friend retweeted a hilarious picture you posted, does it really help your business? This is why Twitter follower stats are the online marketing equivalent of hiring based solely on a resume: nice on paper but not necessarily true in practice.

So how do we solve this problem? Well there may not be a simple answer, but the one we like the most is to start conversations. While we love to see startups growing, we love it even more when we see startups building relationships with their customers. A great example of this was the social networking/design company Fab. When Fab saw its customer base ballooning, it launched an initiative to make customer support and interaction THE priority in its business model. Rather than sitting back and being enamored by the attention, the folks at Fab focused on building a product that was truly effective and creating a user experience that is extremely personal. The result has been Fab becoming one of the fastest-growing businesses on the web today.

Here at FiddleFly, we want to connect with users. Does that mean we want to shut our doors to the world and ask for a password through a tiny window? Of course not. What it means is that we want our followers to really be fans, and we want to be fans of our followers. This market is crazy exciting, and we never get bored talking about it, so we want to find people who are just as excited as we are.

To keep the conversations rolling, tell us what you think below, and if you’re interested in mobile web and all the amazing things it can be, follow us on Twitter @fiddlefly and check us out on Google+ and Facebook. Just be sure to keep in touch!

Follow FiddleFly and Spread The Word:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon

The Highlight of SXSW 2012 is…Highlight.

For those of us who are techies at heart, this time of year is always exciting. New products get launched, the Mobile World Congress wets our appetites for advances in mobile, and of course, South by Southwest Interactive (SXSW) showcases some of the startups and developments that will change the connected world. With SXSW almost in the books, we’ve been keeping close tabs on the developments from Austin, and it’s clear this year’s stand out startup is a social location service called Highlight.

While SXSW buzz by no means guarantees that a company will become a juggernaut, it certainly doesn’t hurt (just ask the folks over at Twitter). We’ve seen the push towards location-based apps emerge over the past four years, and Highlight seems to be continuing that trend.

Highlight works by accessing your Facebook information and then using GPS coordinates to alert you about people you may know in your vicinity. The program allows users to view nearby people’s Facebook information, giving social interaction a new level of familiarity.

Location-based apps have been around for a while now, but with the possible exception of Foursquare (which also got its first public thumbs-up at SXSW in 2009) they seem to have not caught the mainstream favor of the masses. Programs like Loopt and Brightkite, both location-based services, have become buried in the app catalogue and are rarely used outside of small tech circles.

Maybe the best example of the location-based model failing, arrived this weekend as well. After debuting at SXSW three years ago, competing with Foursquare, and eventually being bought by Facebook, the location-based service Gowalla was officially shut down. Gowalla operated by allowing users to check in to locations and share their travels via mobile. Facebook has included a number of location–based features in the past few years that allow for mobile check-ins, which eventually seemed to render Gowalla unnecessary.

Every business is unique, but that doesn’t mean Highlight is in the clear. While Highlight is getting all the press from SXSW, it already has direct competitors like Banjo and Glancee. Highlight has been chided for not being Android friendly (and scolded within the FiddleFly office for not having a mobile-optimized site), so time will tell how the program fares.

Of course, SXSW was not just a celebration for Highlight. There were plenty of great speakers, new developments, and controversial ideas (such as the marketing firm Bartle Bogle Hegarty’s idea to provide homeless people with 4G hotspots).

Tell us what you think about SXSW, Highlight, or anything else on your mind. Follow us on Twitter @fiddlefly for updates and check us out on Google+ and Facebook to see new photos and info about our team.

Follow FiddleFly and Spread The Word:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
 Scroll to top